From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 22 08:34:59 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21DB106564A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:34:59 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org)
Received: from ei.bzerk.org (tunnel490.ipv6.xs4all.nl
	[IPv6:2001:888:10:1ea::2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F4E8FC14
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:34:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2M8YrQs077211;
	Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:34:53 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org)
Received: (from bulk@localhost)
	by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2M8Ypci077210;
	Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:34:51 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org)
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:34:50 +0100
From: Ruben de Groot <mail25@bzerk.org>
To: "Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn@stonehenge.com>
Message-ID: <20100322083450.GA77075@ei.bzerk.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot <mail25@bzerk.org>,
	"Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn@stonehenge.com>,
	Jorge Biquez <jbiquez@icsmx.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx>
	<86vdcp9r57.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <86vdcp9r57.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
	autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ei.bzerk.org
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1
	(ei.bzerk.org [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:34:57 +0100 (CET)
Cc: Jorge Biquez <jbiquez@icsmx.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:34:59 -0000

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 04:44:20PM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz typed:
> 
> Postfix has a readable config file (with comments!) that doesn't
> require "compiling" into the proper syntax.

Here follows a snippets from /etc/mail/freebsd.mc. It's readable and full of comments.
A simple "make" will "compile" the file. What are you complaining about?

dnl Uncomment to allow relaying based on your MX records.
dnl NOTE: This can allow sites to use your server as a backup MX without  
dnl       your permission.
dnl FEATURE(relay_based_on_MX)


> Postfix understands and plays well with things like content-filters,
> RBLs, dovecot (and others) for SSL.

And sendmail does not? You obviously are biased.