From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Jun 21 00:15:32 1996 Return-Path: owner-hardware Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA28407 for hardware-outgoing; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 00:15:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.crl.com (mail.crl.com [165.113.1.22]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA28402; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 00:15:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from uu.elvisti.kiev.ua (acc0.elvisti.kiev.ua) by mail.crl.com with SMTP id AA03032 (5.65c/IDA-1.5); Fri, 21 Jun 1996 00:14:40 -0700 Received: from office.elvisti.kiev.ua (office.elvisti.kiev.ua [193.125.28.129]) by uu.elvisti.kiev.ua (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA09480; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 10:23:40 +0300 (EET DST) Received: (from stesin@localhost) by office.elvisti.kiev.ua (8.6.12/8.ElVisti) id KAA26369; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 10:23:38 +0300 From: "Andrew V. Stesin" Message-Id: <199606210723.KAA26369@office.elvisti.kiev.ua> Subject: Re: Cyrix and AMD chips To: jhs@FreeBSD.org Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 10:23:35 +0300 (EET DST) Cc: hardware@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199606192015.WAA04017@vector.jhs.no_domain> from "Julian H. Stacey" at Jun 19, 96 10:15:42 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24alpha5] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hardware@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi Julian, # Only certainty is: AMD chips are Not always plug compatible. I 100% agree -- not always compatible; not to mention the fact that early Enhanced Am486 chips were ummm... say, crap, and non-enhanced ones generally sucked, too -- compared to Intel. But just now wer'e speaking about (comparatively new) AMD 5x133 chip. That's plain different story. _This_ particular chip is really nice, do you agree? -- With best regards -- Andrew Stesin. +380 (44) 2760188 +380 (44) 2713457 +380 (44) 2713560 "You may delegate authority, but not responsibility." Frank's Management Rule #1.