From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Oct 15 9:22: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from cs.rpi.edu (mumble.cs.rpi.edu [128.213.8.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4609837B407 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 09:22:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs.rpi.edu (monica.cs.rpi.edu [128.213.7.2]) by cs.rpi.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA63597 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 12:22:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200110151622.MAA63597@cs.rpi.edu> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: debugging question Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 12:22:01 -0400 From: "David E. Cross" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I received the following from gdb today: #0 0x0 in ?? () #1 0x280a8d22 in svc_getreqset2 () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4 #2 0x280a8c5b in svc_getreqset () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4 #3 0x804c85f in yp_svc_run () #4 0x804cd94 in main () #5 0x8049a09 in _start () Uhm... I didn't think that was possible. I thought the kernel stored the last stack frame iteslf, from the SIG handler in kernel-space. -- David Cross | email: crossd@cs.rpi.edu Lab Director | Rm: 308 Lally Hall Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, | Ph: 518.276.2860 Department of Computer Science | Fax: 518.276.4033 I speak only for myself. | WinNT:Linux::Linux:FreeBSD To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message