Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:34:00 -0500 From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with focus, longevity, and lifecycle Message-ID: <CACqU3MXGxRpyT4CDHmzpvzwSPsFi1MHxWa6C9RJiJ1jditWB4Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120124211011.GA3528@lonesome.com> References: <CACqU3MXpc0EBYH=z745OOzs%2BEnmZzarUMcuAv5Q643Dq4Xs8LQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120124211011.GA3528@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote: >> On 24 January 2012 18:36, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> wrote: >> It is less a problem of having the tools than having the will to do >> everything publicly. From experience, committers loves to do all kind >> of things privately/secretly. > > Perhaps it's human nature because of all the increasingly nit-picky, passive- > agressive, whiny, sarcastic, and generally asinine postings such as yours. > You are indeed right. However, I might just be also interested to review/comment code, discuss regressions, and architecture, for a change ;-) Unfortunately, such threads rarely ever happens. Most of the time, the only food provided is a really indigestible +5000/-3000 patch, where all the thinking, architectural design and code has been done behind closed door of a limited few committers, research lab or company. regards. - Arnaud
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACqU3MXGxRpyT4CDHmzpvzwSPsFi1MHxWa6C9RJiJ1jditWB4Q>