From owner-cvs-share  Thu May 16 03:14:09 1996
Return-Path: owner-cvs-share
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id DAA14662
          for cvs-share-outgoing; Thu, 16 May 1996 03:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA14654;
          Thu, 16 May 1996 03:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id DAA08412; Thu, 16 May 1996 03:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
To: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>
cc: Joerg Wunsch <joerg@freefall.freebsd.org>,
        CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org,
        cvs-share@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/doc/handbook contrib.sgml 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 15 May 1996 23:20:18 CDT."
             <Pine.NEB.3.93.960515231734.1609A-100000@Fieber-John.campusview.indiana.edu> 
Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 03:09:49 -0700
Message-ID: <8410.832241389@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-share@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Unless someone has a compelling argument to the contrary, I have
> been operating on the assumption that all handbook work would be
> on current and would just be brought over to 2.1 as a single
> commit in the "final hour" before release.
> 
> Any objections? 

Seems a reasonable assumption to me!

					Jordan