From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Feb 19 17:23:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n37.san.rr.com (dt051n37.san.rr.com [204.210.32.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB4437B503 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:23:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from gorean.org (Studded@master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n37.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA72463; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:23:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@gorean.org) Message-ID: <3A91C71D.D8ED44B3@gorean.org> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:23:41 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Peterson Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DJBDNS vs. BIND References: <200102190547.WAA12829@usr05.primenet.com> <3A90CA94.D7CBCB65@softweyr.com> <20010218233916.J28286@lizzy.bugworks.com> <3A9149CC.7A1FADB8@softweyr.com> <20010219101234.A98114@danp.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dan Peterson wrote: > > Wes Peters wrote: > > > But with BIND, you the user can fix them. You can do that with DJBDNS, too, > > but you can't share your fixes with anyone else. > > http://www.djbdns.org > > > Dynamic DNS? > > I can't say I've ever used this. Sounds like another BIND klugde, though. It > would probably be easier to write a simple script to edit your data file and > rebuild data.cdb. RTFM at http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/tinydns-data.html . > > > DNSSEC? > > http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/forgery.html > > > Cache control and forwarding? > > RTFM at http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/dnscache.html . > > > and found that we could not distribute the modified versions > > Again, http://www.djbdns.org . > > > You seem to completely miss the fact that it's NOT DJB's code we really > > object to, but rather the license. > > I don't really care about djbdns being in the base system; I just want > people to stop spreading misinformation. It's not misinformation to say that djbdns doesn't implement dnssec. This is a typical (and unfortunate) response from someone who advocates djb's world view. Explaining why he thinks something isn't a good idea is not the same as implementing it. Similar points could be made for the other topics in this e-mail. The reasons for not putting djbdns in the base have been adequately made, I won't belabor them. Doug -- "Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory . . . lasts forever." -- Keanu Reeves as Shane Falco in "The Replacements" Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message