From owner-freebsd-net  Fri Mar 26  0: 8:19 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from silver.sms.fi (silver.sms.fi [194.111.122.17])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E46B51555E
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:06:28 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from pete@sms.fi)
Received: from sms.fi (localhost.sms.fi [127.0.0.1])
	by silver.sms.fi (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id KAA20832;
	Fri, 26 Mar 1999 10:04:38 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from pete@sms.fi)
Message-ID: <36FB3F96.3303181A@sms.fi>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 10:04:38 +0200
From: Petri Helenius <pete@sms.fi>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE i386)
X-Accept-Language: en,fi
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jim Shankland <jas@flyingfox.com>
Cc: dillon@apollo.backplane.com, j@lumiere.net,
	freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: 3.1-STABLE dies on 40+ connects
References: <199903252357.PAA21856@biggusdiskus.flyingfox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Jim Shankland wrote:
> 
> Bingo.  Look at those send buffers.
> 
> Of course, crashing when you run out of mbuf clusters is not what I'd
> call graceful degradation.
> 
Agreed. I've seen this behaviour on other kind of applications also, without
the "need" for the application to ask for bigger buffers.

Pete


> Jim Shankland
> NLynx Systems, Inc.
> 
> [Redirected to -net only; I'm getting tired of seeing each of these
> messages twice.]
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message