From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 2 2:33:39 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C19937B401 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 02:33:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.bellavista.cz (mail.bellavista.cz [62.168.44.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CF743EC2 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 02:33:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from neuhauser@bellavista.cz) Received: from freepuppy.bellavista.cz (freepuppy.bellavista.cz [10.0.0.10]) by mail.bellavista.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DFA69; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:33:34 +0100 (CET) Received: by freepuppy.bellavista.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9AE7B2FDB04; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:33:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:33:31 +0100 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Lowell Gilbert Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: do we have to wait for PHP 4.3 port? Message-ID: <20030102103331.GF348@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20021230194818.A18495@mail.hitmedia.com> <3E11152B.2050401@mac.com> <003d01c2b081$b5bedf10$3224200a@me3> <441y3y4ybi.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <002b01c2b08d$7eac8cf0$3224200a@me3> <44fzsewvad.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44fzsewvad.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG # freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com / 2002-12-31 01:35:06 -0500: > "Brian" writes: > > BTW I'd love to see sendmail and named removed from the installs and > > moved to ports/packages only. > > Lots of people say that, but no one's done the work yet. It's a > *huge* amount of work, if you think about it: being able to deliver > daily reports is a critical function, "Warning: you *must* install an MTA for the system to function properly! Take a look at /usr/ports/mail." :) > and while most systems don't need named, other essential resolver > tools can't be easily separated from the rest of BIND. "other essential resolver tools"... what are they? are you talking about dig and other commad line tools, or the library? DJB has released his resolver library into public domain, and it's easily separated from the rest of djbdns. :) Maybe that could help the issue? :) -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message