From owner-cvs-all  Fri Mar  9  1: 2:59 2001
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E91D037B719; Fri,  9 Mar 2001 01:02:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au)
Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102])
	by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA29546;
	Fri, 9 Mar 2001 20:02:47 +1100
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 20:02:20 +1100 (EST)
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org
To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/scripts doFS.sh 
In-Reply-To: <200103090406.f2946Bs04692@billy-club.village.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103091955120.900-100000@besplex.bde.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Warner Losh wrote:

> [[ I want to get the reason for this in the archives ]]
> 
> In message <200103090103.f2913GQ88940@freefall.freebsd.org> "David E. O'Brien" writes:
> :   newfs with `-m 1'
> :   
> :   This is needed even with `-o space' as the kernel decides to be "helpful"
> :   and not really do space optimization.

Why `-m 1' instead of `-m 0'?

This change seems to have no effect.  There was already a `tunefs -m 0' on
the next line of doFS.sh, and the change doesn't remove it.  Setting -m in
a separate command was just inefficient.  Now it is bogus.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message