From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 19 10:21:59 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E38D273
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 19 May 2015 10:21:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from homiemail-a94.g.dreamhost.com (sub5.mail.dreamhost.com
 [208.113.200.129])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B9213CA
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 19 May 2015 10:21:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from homiemail-a94.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by homiemail-a94.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2411538A06F;
 Tue, 19 May 2015 03:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=ozzmosis.com; h=date:from
 :to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:
 in-reply-to; s=ozzmosis.com; bh=CID31NB2kDDIrDtSUJZvwvxrHg8=; b=
 GFzSTwAlnwBj177RF3mdBHaM7x1in5W8ll6J0YfawBtwQ2EK1i4FlNG6t9l0bH5K
 YIYv2YVoS47uTVx3hmi5r4s/+Cl1tvMJ881jn2JFwlBhdbLzNJzvOqaSShm0VXiI
 Zn4b78DXNKHKHagEQWJdOafKpj+8NgERAYNTapzEa9s=
Received: from blizzard.ozzmosis.com (203-206-127-199.dyn.iinet.net.au
 [203.206.127.199])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 (Authenticated sender: relay@ozzmosis.com)
 by homiemail-a94.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF01238A059;
 Tue, 19 May 2015 03:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by blizzard.ozzmosis.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
 id BE0C4946; Tue, 19 May 2015 20:21:55 +1000 (AEST)
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 20:21:55 +1000
From: andrew clarke <mail@ozzmosis.com>
To: Helmut Schneider <jumper99@gmx.de>
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 'mount_smbfs -o' on FreeBSD 10.1
Message-ID: <20150519102155.GA88695@ozzmosis.com>
References: <xn0jm6it6aqftyj000@news.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <xn0jm6it6aqftyj000@news.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 10:21:59 -0000

On Mon 2015-05-18 18:53:52 UTC+0000, Helmut Schneider (jumper99@gmx.de) wrote:

> I upgraded from 9.3 to 10.1 yesterday. I used to use a script that
> mounts SMB shares and not fstab because 9.3 booted to single user mode
> when the SMB server was unavailable.
> 
> It seems that with 10.1 mount_smbfs does not support the "-o" switch
> anymore:

I think it does...
 
> [helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$ sudo mount_smbfs -o noexec,nosuid,noatime,ro -N
> -I 192.168.124.251 -W DOMAIN //unix-smb-dummy@fs01/install
> /var/www/var/www/smbfs/install
> mount_smbfs: mount error: /var/www/var/www/smbfs/install Invalid option
> [helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$ sudo mount_smbfs -N -I 192.168.124.251 -W DOMAIN
> //unix-smb-dummy@fs01/install /var/www/var/www/smbfs/install
> [helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$
> 
> How can I pass those options with 10.1?

I suspect it's the "noatime" option that it's objecting to, although
you wouldn't know from the error message. Try it without noatime.

Also, fwiw, you can use mount -t instead. This works for me on 10.1:

$ sudo mount -t smbfs -o -U=ozzmosis -o noexec,nosuid,ro //server/share /mnt