From owner-freebsd-current Sun Dec 27 18:12:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA08142 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 18:12:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA08134; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 18:12:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.1/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA71019; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 03:10:49 +0100 (CET) To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Christian Kuhtz , Gary Palmer , Kenneth Wayne Culver , Greg Lehey , FreeBSD current users Subject: Re: Thanks, Core Team In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 27 Dec 1998 17:58:06 PST." <12586.914810286@zippy.cdrom.com> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 03:10:49 +0100 Message-ID: <71017.914811049@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <12586.914810286@zippy.cdrom.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: >> Not populating /lkm is sabotage. Regardless of the merits of kldm. > >Please explain the precise meaning if your statement. This strikes >me as just more ignorant speculation by someone who hasn't even bothered >to do a feature-by-feature comparison of /modules and the old /kld. Not to mention ever contributed anything to FreeBSD (-- that I can remember at least, correct me if I'm wrong!) -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "ttyv0" -- What UNIX calls a $20K state-of-the-art, 3D, hi-res color terminal To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message