From owner-freebsd-scsi Mon Mar 26 5: 4:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from ns.uninet.ee (ns.uninet.ee [194.204.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83C637B71B for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 05:04:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mauri@inspiral.net) Received: from inspiral.net (tigris-isdn-89.uninet.ee [194.204.61.89]) by ns.uninet.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D3525881; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 15:04:03 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <3ABF3E42.B9107727@inspiral.net> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 16:04:03 +0300 From: Lauri Laupmaa Organization: Inspiral.Net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Koptsevich , scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: defetcs list References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Alexey Koptsevich wrote: > >camcontrol defects da2 -f bfi -G > Got 5 defects: > 914:5:218112 > 2118:2:20480 > 2118:2:20992 > 2119:2:20480 > 2119:2:25088 > > Are there any standards for the number of bad blocks allowed for the disk > during warranty period? Other interesting thing is that I think its even a small number for glist. > >camcontrol defects da2 -f bfi -G |wc > Got 5 defects: > 5 5 65 > >camcontrol defects da2 -f bfi -P |wc > Got 6156 defects: > 6156 6156 85238 > > Can such large number of primary defects be considered as normal? Which > defect growth rate may one expect from such figure from this > (modern) drive (it is of course informal question)? Yep, its quite normal. Here I'm coming again with my old proposal: There should be a periodic script which compares glist from today and glist from, say week ago and from install time and put it in [daily/weekly/monthly] mail. -- L. Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message