From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 22 07:32:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA28B16A41F for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:32:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snacktime@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194D743D46 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:32:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snacktime@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so112232nzk for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:32:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Q71meuFi/vXpuCW04BV6WhhFksCZd6b+jexzyfPPKARnKSfph5kPOU7AJk9t31o0JvIHVfycIJUMkk7jCmPnsE3Jmcouw+g6XuRLdWZ+SU6/GNDLe14AcmW8lw3X9crXFLs90aajTINeoyoKXT66GUupbxtlTFjLAOq13c98o54= Received: by 10.54.32.36 with SMTP id f36mr3004553wrf; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:32:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.23.70 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:32:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1f060c4c05092200321619f2aa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:32:28 -0700 From: snacktime To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050920103202.82870.qmail@web34606.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20050920103202.82870.qmail@web34606.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Performance of mailserevr in FreeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: snacktime List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:32:30 -0000 On 9/20/05, Deepak Naidu wrote: > > Hi, > > I wanted to know whether FreeBSD can make a perfect > mailserver compared to mailservers on linux. I am in > process of porting them, but needed some statistical > info regarding its performance compared with other os. > How do you define perfect? Performance? Mail servers are there own animal, performance doesn't apply in the same way it does with a web server for instance. Honestly, you are asking the wrong questions. The issues you will most likely face are tuning issues for large numbers of processes and files on disk. The mail server software you use will have way more impact on your performance and capacity then the OS will. If you want more specific answers you need to be more specific in your question. Give some details about what you need to do, what capacity you need, and you will probably get some helpful answers. You just aren't givin= g enough information to get anything useful in return other than 'ya freebsd will work fine'. Chris