From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 16:58:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6401065670 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:58:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Pascal.Stumpf@cubes.de) Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (smtprelay04.ispgateway.de [80.67.29.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819B18FC21 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [62.224.176.55] (helo=ikarus.local.cubes.de) by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Oy5zG-0001jo-LC for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:46:34 +0200 From: Pascal Stumpf To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:46:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-STABLE; KDE/4.5.1; amd64; ; ) References: <20100921093106.GA95379@lordcow.org> <20100921134554.GA10927@lordcow.org> In-Reply-To: <20100921134554.GA10927@lordcow.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201009211846.34982.Pascal.Stumpf@cubes.de> X-Df-Sender: 429867 Subject: Re: source tree out of sync X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:58:50 -0000 On Tuesday 21 September 2010 15:45:54 Gareth de Vaux wrote: > On Tue 2010-09-21 (11:31), Gareth de Vaux wrote: > > I assume I can't do this safely if my /usr/src tree has been > > updated since my last make world? >=20 > Well, doesn't look like it's an issue for me in this instance. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =46or the record: It would not be a problem at all, at least in this=20 particular case: You=E2=80=99re only patching and reinstalling bzip2, which= =20 hasn=E2=80=99t had a commit for ages except this one security patch. See: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/contrib/bzip2/ You=E2=80=99re not touching any other system component, so the date of your= =20 /usr/src checkout is not an issue. You could even csup the most recent=20 version instead of applying the patch manually and then recompile bzip2=20 only. Cheers, Pascal