Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:21:41 +0800 From: ke han <ke.han@redstarling.com> To: freebsd-questions Questions list <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: conary vs ports Message-ID: <FE25119D-3CED-409C-B27F-FB514C50C695@redstarling.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Does anyone have experience with the differences between conary and ports? Its my understanding the rpath folks have rethought package management at a very high level and have something more to offer than gentoo's portage (which some feel is the closest thing in usability to FreeBSD's ports). Does anyone have a hands-on perspective of this? I don't mean that "ports already has 16,000+ ready to go ports and conary has much fewer". Nor am I looking for the usual FreeBSD vs Linux perspective. I'm looking for a tech and architecture perspective of just conary vs ports. thanks, ke han
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FE25119D-3CED-409C-B27F-FB514C50C695>