From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jun 3 18:17:44 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA01757 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 3 Jun 1996 18:17:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from opnor.comdyn.com.au (opnor.comdyn.com.au [203.63.132.50]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA01749 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 1996 18:17:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by opnor.comdyn.com.au id LAA03698 (8.7.5/IDA-1.6 for ); Tue, 4 Jun 1996 11:17:00 +1000 (EST) Received: from keper.comdyn.com.au(172.16.1.40) by opnor.comdyn.com.au via smap (V1.3) id sma003694; Tue Jun 4 11:16:47 1996 Received: from comdyn.comdyn.com.au (comdyn.comdyn.com.au [172.16.128.6]) by keper.comdyn.com.au with SMTP id LAA05979 (8.7.5/IDA-1.6 for ); Tue, 4 Jun 1996 11:18:41 +1000 (EST) Received: by comdyn.comdyn.com.au (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA24295; Tue, 4 Jun 96 11:15:54 EST Date: Tue, 4 Jun 96 11:15:54 EST From: dem@comdyn.com.au (David Mikov) Message-Id: <9606040115.AA24295@comdyn.comdyn.com.au> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: INTEL EtherExpress PRO/100 support or not ? Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Dear All, Is the INTEL EtherExpress PRO/100 (82557 chip) PCI adapter supported by FreeBSD 2.1 ? Note: I believe there is an older board based on the (82556 chip) that does not work, is this correct ? Regards DEM.