From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Aug 28 09:22:59 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id JAA12145 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 28 Aug 1995 09:22:59 -0700 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA12137 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 1995 09:22:53 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA11831; Mon, 28 Aug 1995 09:22:32 -0700 To: dennis@et.htp.com (dennis) cc: Adrian Corston , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: alias ( secondary IP ) for Ethernet Ifaces in FreeBSD In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 28 Aug 1995 12:11:15 EDT." <199508281611.MAA02136@mail.htp.com> Date: Mon, 28 Aug 1995 09:22:31 -0700 Message-ID: <11829.809626951@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > Well, they say you get what you pay for....except I paid for BSD/OS and I > get no response from them either....... I am seriously confused. Did the rest of us here all come in somewhere in the middle of a long conversation, or what? Needless to say, I'm totally unable to make heads-or-tails of the attribution nesting in the snippet of included text (it went 5 levels deep in the middle!). What's the summary here? Is someone upset about a gated bug, a FreeBSD bug or a little of both? Background details please! Thanks! Jordan