From owner-freebsd-security Fri Oct 22 0:38: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237E014D07; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 00:38:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA55460; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 09:37:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des) To: Robert Watson Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Finer-grained securelevel: proof of concept References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 22 Oct 1999 09:37:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: Robert Watson's message of "Thu, 21 Oct 1999 11:54:02 -0400 (EDT)" Message-ID: Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Robert Watson writes: > On 21 Oct 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Robert Watson writes: > > > Very clean, pretty, etc -- only one object: please call it something other > > > than capabilities :-). [deletia] > > Please read the thread on -security and -arch that lead to these > > patches. > I did--hence my comments. You seem to have missed the part that says "this should be integrated with process-level and user-level capabilities". DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message