Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Jan 2021 22:21:02 +0100
From:      Juraj Lutter <otis@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-git <freebsd-git@freebsd.org>, Gordon Tetlow <gordon@freebsd.org>, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: git transition plan for base/user/cperciva/freebsd-update-build
Message-ID:  <27283DDB-E304-4840-A4E1-1DAF16C7731C@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOtMX2gDqPw%2BxkOyi1kEYADcKWQuR8Aqp=nEOQj5qR3b71GNhw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAOtMX2hMRhzntJ9rChyuzpUdRDT0qDzkSSY5RPLdS0Dfs6HU9g@mail.gmail.com> <CDA1B7C7-3D99-4C32-AA93-02D0FECA624F@FreeBSD.org> <CAOtMX2gDqPw%2BxkOyi1kEYADcKWQuR8Aqp=nEOQj5qR3b71GNhw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On 29 Jan 2021, at 22:06, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 1:28 PM Juraj Lutter <otis@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
>=20
> > On 29 Jan 2021, at 21:12, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >=20
> > What is the plan to transition the
> > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/user/cperciva/freebsd-update-build/ =
code?
> > It's not really a branch of src; it's more like an independent =
project.
> > Will it be getting its own repository?
>=20
> This is a good question. The other question is if it could be =
simplified somehow,
> for use cases where users do not want/need patches and only want to =
build updates for
> their running systems for regular maintenance.
>=20
> For users who don't need patches?  Do you mean as a substitute for the =
old:
>=20
> $ cd /usr/src
> $ svn up=20
> $ make buildworld
> $ make buildkernel
>=20
> Or by "don't need patches", do you mean building updates based on =
tracking stable/12 instead of downloading the security advisory patches? =
 I don't think the former makes sense.  For just one system, building =
world and kernel by hand is much easier than using freebsd-update-build.

Yes, I mean building updates based on tracking stable/12 (a rolling? =
release, sort of).
For just one system, buildworld seems OK, but for more systems it may be =
a burden.

Have you also considered pkgbase?




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?27283DDB-E304-4840-A4E1-1DAF16C7731C>