From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Jul 31 13:06:31 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA22035
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 13:06:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA22026
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 13:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA02674; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 13:05:53 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199607312005.NAA02674@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: `const char rcsid[]' vs -traditional
To: wollman@lcs.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman)
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 13:05:53 -0700 (MST)
Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, wollman@lcs.mit.edu, current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <9607291826.AA22390@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> from "Garrett Wollman" at Jul 29, 96 02:26:51 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > It's broken for non-ANSI compilers.
> 
> I'm quite aware of this; indeed, I quoted precisely that in my reply
> to your original message.  This doesn't answer the question of why
> anyone would care (Terry Lambert excluded).  I certainly don't.

Is anyone else trying to use lcc?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.