From owner-freebsd-current Tue Aug 19 23:34:30 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA02840 for current-outgoing; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 23:34:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.local.sunyit.edu (A-T34.rh.sunyit.edu [150.156.210.241]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA02835; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 23:34:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (perlsta@localhost) by server.local.sunyit.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA12335; Wed, 20 Aug 1997 01:39:41 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: server.local.sunyit.edu: perlsta owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 01:39:41 +0000 (GMT) From: Alfred Perlstein X-Sender: perlsta@server.local.sunyit.edu To: Steve Passe cc: smp@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: SMP in a "production system" In-Reply-To: <199708200549.XAA18105@Ilsa.StevesCafe.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk a LOT of people told me that the SMP kernel/system is VERY stable, so far are many things broken or is everything ok? I'm thinking about getting together an SMP system and was wondering how the SMP system holds out against heavy load and other factors. ._________________________________________ __ _ |Alfred Perlstein - Programming & SysAdmin for hire... |perlsta@sunyit.edu |http://www.cs.sunyit.edu/~perlsta : ---"Have you seen my FreeBSD tatoo?" ' ---"who was that masked admin?"