From owner-freebsd-qa Thu Dec 20 15:51:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Received: from mao.stokely.org (mao.stokely.org [65.84.64.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9273C37B41D; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 15:50:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by mao.stokely.org (Postfix, from userid 2074) id E47DD4B6A7; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 15:50:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 15:50:28 -0800 From: Murray Stokely To: John Baldwin Cc: qa@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Should we test cdboot on 4.5 RC's? Message-ID: <20011220155028.K28678@windriver.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 03:46:14PM -0800 X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D Sender: owner-freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 03:46:14PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > Hmm, does anyone else think it might be worthwhile to MFC the new cdboot > replacement for the broken cdldr code in 4.x. Then for the RC's we chould ship > two versions of each ISO, one with cdboot as the bootable image and the other > with boot.flp so we can have people test it and see how if cdboot works on most > computers or not? The only difference in the ISO's is what image is set as I think this is a good idea. - Murray To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message