Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:13:10 -0500
From:      Jason Bacon <bacon4000@gmail.com>
To:        Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Mark Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r483245 - head/biology/stacks
Message-ID:  <9ca1854a-e1ec-e5be-b389-58ce52df7b9e@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20181030184712.GC9229@lonesome.com>
References:  <201810280858.w9S8w0sk015320@repo.freebsd.org> <5zxm-1d6y-wny@FreeBSD.org> <20181030184712.GC9229@lonesome.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/30/18 1:47 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 01:13:41PM +0100, Jan Beich wrote:
>> Mark Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>> Why not USES=compiler:gcc-c++11-lib ?
> I didn't realize they were equivalent.
>
> mcl
>
It achieves the same effect here, but I'm not crazy about replacing the 
explicit openmp requirement with a gcc requirement.  It's vague and 
seems like a step backward.  If it's not clearly documented that a port 
requires openmp, someone could inadvertently make a change that disables 
openmp in the future.

It would be nice if we could do something like

USES=           compiler:openmp,c++11-lib gmake python shebangfix

but multiple compiler arguments don't seem to be supported.

Or maybe we could add an openmp-c++11-lib argument?

-- 
Earth is a beta site.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9ca1854a-e1ec-e5be-b389-58ce52df7b9e>