From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 18 07:48:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6BA16A4CE for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:48:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from postman.arcor.de (postman4.arcor-online.net [151.189.0.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19BFD43D39 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:48:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-51-138.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.51.138]) (authenticated bits=0)i2IFmtD2016867 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:48:55 +0100 (MET) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1B3zlK-0004Ns-Bg; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:48:50 +0100 Message-ID: <4059C4E1.5050009@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:48:49 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vman@tmok.com References: <4059B9E9.80802@fillmore-labs.com> <20040318150738.GA87118@k2.homeunix.net> <4059BD4E.7040803@fillmore-labs.com> <20040318152648.GA91776@k2.homeunix.net> In-Reply-To: <20040318152648.GA91776@k2.homeunix.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/64415: make in ports stopped by ASCII GUI X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:48:57 -0000 Vlad Manilici wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > On 18.03.04|16:16, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > >>It isn't. Provide a rationale. You could just hit `OK' if you are >>willing to accept the defaults. > > Like this, it is not straightforward to automate the process. Do you > like how the Linux kernel is built, with a "make menuconfig" GUI > selection? As stated before: "PR 64233 will use default options when build with BATCH=yes." Does this solve your problem? >>Patches are always welcome. > > I can do it, if there is any interest :). But there are a couple of > packet with this problem... There is interest. PR 63682 does use default options (always) when PACKAGE_BUILDING is set. PR 64233 uses saved options, but defaults to the default configuration without popping up a preferences dialog when BATCH is set.