From owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org  Sat Feb 23 22:56:16 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F57315079AD;
 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 22:56:16 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org)
Received: from mx2.enfer-du-nord.net (mx2.enfer-du-nord.net
 [IPv6:2001:41d0:401:2100::5:8a0e])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D908272969;
 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 22:56:15 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org)
Received: from [IPv6:2003:e9:7f29:ac01:c583:48db:f286:7fe3]
 (p200300E97F29AC01C58348DBF2867FE3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
 [IPv6:2003:e9:7f29:ac01:c583:48db:f286:7fe3])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx2.enfer-du-nord.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 446Nq73fZxzFRn;
 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 23:56:03 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.101.1 at mail.enfer-du-nord.net
From: Michael Grimm <trashcan@ellael.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Subject: Re: Performance issues with VNET/bridge/VLAN
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 23:56:00 +0100
References: <9B0EC546-38E6-424E-9CC9-93F4C58B296F@punkt.de>
 <355c746ae7ec884407299e2649283cfc@ellael.org>
 <8ABA2B5F-6A94-4907-B623-6B7E9BC83CB3@punkt.de>
To: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>,
 freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <8ABA2B5F-6A94-4907-B623-6B7E9BC83CB3@punkt.de>
Message-Id: <79A4C471-FCDF-4C2D-BBEF-6512F3AF608F@ellael.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE
 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.kaan-bock.lan
X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" <freebsd-jail.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-jail>,
 <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail>,
 <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 22:56:16 -0000

Hi

On 22. Feb 2019, at 19:48, Patrick M. Hausen <hausen@punkt.de> wrote:

> epair(4) interfaces added to the bridge

These are my number one suspects when it comes to performance loss =
within a VNET jail compared to the host system.=20

> But I=E2=80=99ll fiddle with LRO nonetheless and report if that =
changes anything.

I'm interested to learn if bare metal might behave comparable to cloud =
infrastructure or not?

Regards,
Michael=