From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 21:27:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CA316A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:27:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006E443D1D for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:27:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from dougb.net ([24.130.110.32]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP id <20040928212741011006km69e>; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:27:52 +0000 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:27:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Peter Schultz In-Reply-To: <727FCC18-1156-11D9-BBA6-000D936BE398@beforever.com> Message-ID: <20040928142532.M90002@qbhto.arg> References: <20040928025635.Q5094@ync.qbhto.arg> <727FCC18-1156-11D9-BBA6-000D936BE398@beforever.com> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: named now runs chroot'ed by default X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:27:53 -0000 On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Peter Schultz wrote: > Why not do it FreeBSD style and auto-jail named? The simplest answer is that not every host can burn (or even obtain) an extra IP address for the jail. It's also questionable what additional benefit would be obtained. Of course, if someone else finds the time to implement this, I will give it a serious look. I'm not _opposed_ to the idea. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection