From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jul 27 9:40:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D429337BC1D for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:40:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e6RGeDW24673; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:40:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:40:13 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" Cc: John Polstra , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How much security should ldconfig enforce? Message-ID: <20000727094013.T17222@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20000727075027.C8974@hamlet.nectar.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <20000727075027.C8974@hamlet.nectar.com>; from n@nectar.com on Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 07:50:27AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Jacques A. Vidrine [000727 05:50] wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 07:36:13PM -0700, John Polstra wrote: > > 3. It could default to strictly secure but accept a command-line > > option to relax the constraints. And an rc.conf knob could be added > > to control whether or not it was strict at boot time. > > I like this option, but the knob should be compile-time, IMHO. Compile time options died in the early 90's dude. :) -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message