From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Apr 13 09:35:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA28982 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Mon, 13 Apr 1998 09:35:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lariat.lariat.org (ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [129.72.251.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA28955 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 1998 16:35:02 GMT (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA14380; Mon, 13 Apr 1998 10:34:58 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199804131634.KAA14380@lariat.lariat.org> X-Sender: brett@mail.lariat.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 10:27:46 -0600 To: "Jason C. Wells" , chat@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: New name? In-Reply-To: References: <199804130313.VAA06062@lariat.lariat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 10:00 PM 4/12/98 -0700, Jason C. Wells wrote: >I happen to like FreeBSD as I consider Free to mean freedom and not >necessarily "with out cost". I concede that this may not be so with the >suits. > >If there is a name change, let the name of a specific product change. I >think any name change to the organization at large should NOT occur. >FreeBSD Inc should remain FreeBSD Inc. Seconded. I think that the product names should go upscale, but the name of the group should still reflect the aim of producting freely redistributable, freely reusable code. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message