From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 12 23:26:10 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id XAA18304 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 12 Feb 1996 23:26:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA18290 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 1996 23:26:05 -0800 (PST) Received: (from narvi@localhost) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA04432; Tue, 13 Feb 1996 09:26:20 +0200 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 09:26:19 +0200 (EET) From: Narvi To: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi cc: hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it just my imagination... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Mon, 12 Feb 1996, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: > On Mon, 12 Feb 1996, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > Or is BSD/OS looking more like FreeBSD every day? :-) > > > > http://www.bsdi.com/products/internet-server/new-features-2.1.html > > > > Jordan > > Sure it is. but with the difference in price... > > I was wondering... If I knew the address of some "big" in Microsoft, > I'll mail him, asking if it is not time to stop whith that NT and invest in > FreeBSD, is cheaper, > good, fast, and easy to operate than a NT machine.. Only a few enhancements, > ant it (FreeBSD) will put all those windows95 happy. > > Sergio de Almeida Lenzi. > > Please don't - any good has never come out of Micro$oft. They would just take it up, wreck it, claim even more how superior they are and so on - I really don't think any good would come out of it. But then again - it would be good if more commercial software was available and supported on FreeBSD - but the OS should remain free. Sander.