From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 23 16:13:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223461065677; Sat, 23 May 2009 16:13:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2998FC1B; Sat, 23 May 2009 16:13:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from ds4.des.no (cm-84.215.252.34.getinternet.no [84.215.252.34]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA766D41C; Sat, 23 May 2009 18:13:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5365E84498; Sat, 23 May 2009 18:13:48 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Robert Watson References: <200905231600.n4NG0G78059747@svn.freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 18:13:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Robert Watson's message of "Sat, 23 May 2009 17:09:30 +0100 (BST)") Message-ID: <863aavyeyr.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r192639 - head/sys/cddl/boot/zfs X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 16:13:52 -0000 Robert Watson writes: > "Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav" writes: > > Remove svn:keywords on a file that had fbsd:nokeywords (though I don't > > understand the reason for the latter) > This seems backwards, as does the commit that followed it to remove > the expanded $FreeBSD$ string. I just restored the file to the state it was in before I started messing with it yesterday. > Is there any reason this file shouldn't have an ID string? Or rather, > is there any reason to have an unexpanded one as opposed to none, or > an expanded one? Not that I know of, but when I became aware of the conflict, the easiest way out was to revert my change. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no