From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jul  4 20:22:21 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105C316A4D0
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  4 Jul 2004 20:22:21 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ni-mail2.dna.utvinternet.net (ni-mail2.dna.utvinternet.net
	[194.46.8.26])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F5043D46
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  4 Jul 2004 20:22:20 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from fergus@cobbled.net)
Received: from eyore.public.cobbled.net (unverified [195.218.107.39]) by
	ni-mail2.dna.utvinternet.net
	<B0053607648@ni-mail2.dna.utvinternet.net> for
	<freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 21:22:16 +0100
Received: from eyore.public.cobbled.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i64KNBRj031234	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 4 Jul 2004 21:23:11 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from fergus@eyore.public.cobbled.net)
Received: (from fergus@localhost)
	by eyore.public.cobbled.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id i64KN9CV031233
	for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 21:23:09 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from fergus)
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 21:23:09 +0100
From: n0g0013 <ttz@cobbled.net>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040704202309.GA30837@eyore.cobbled.net>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
References: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED802E86EBB@bragi.housing.ufl.edu>
	<40E59559.8090907@cronyx.ru> <p06002035bd0b4bebb128@[10.0.1.3]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <p06002035bd0b4bebb128@[10.0.1.3]>
Subject: Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat removed, linux to follow
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 20:22:21 -0000

On 02.07-19:31, Brad Knowles wrote:
[ ... ]
> 	Yup.  PGP sign everything, and make sure that your keys don't 
> ever get stolen or compromised.  That makes it much harder for 
> someone to successfully impersonate you.

what is the story with PGP signatures these days?  last i
investigated there was a multi-part mime format that was meant
to be standard and nobody used (except mutt, which i use).

does anyone use that format or is it all inline now?  mutt
won't recognise the inline format as signed (and consequently
won't verify the content).

-- 
        t
 t
                 z