From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 20 09:01:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7140316A4C0; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 09:01:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Kain.sumuk.de (Kain.sumuk.de [213.221.86.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5810F43F3F; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 09:01:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vincent@sumuk.de) Received: from Moses.earth.sol (Moses.earth.sol [192.168.1.1]) by Kain.sumuk.de (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h7KG1ZZ6010519; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:01:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from vincent@sumuk.de) Received: from Moses.earth.sol (localhost.earth.sol [127.0.0.1]) by Moses.earth.sol (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h7KG1YPg050686; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:01:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from vincent@Moses.earth.sol) Received: (from vincent@localhost) by Moses.earth.sol (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id h7KG1XXx050685; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:01:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:01:33 +0200 From: Martin Heinen To: Tom Rhodes Message-ID: <20030820180132.A44501@sumuk.de> References: <20030820110031.6953360b.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20030820110031.6953360b.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>; from trhodes@freebsd.org on Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:00:31AM -0400 cc: FreeBSD-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kerberos in the handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD-doc@freebsd.org List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:01:39 -0000 On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:00:31AM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > What exactly do we do with the kerberos information in the handbook? > I have a Kerberos5 document which is nearly complete, should it: > > o Be a new chapter? > o Be added as a second part to the current KerberosIV information? > o Should I place it in the Security chapter, move the current section > to KerberosIV, add a note that Kerberos5 is only in FreeBSD 5.1 and > beyond? > > I'm leaning toward the last option but would like a few general > comments first. Kerberos V5 is the recommended version nowadays. The new Kerberos V5 chapter should replace the existing chapter. We could add a subsection describing the differences to Kerberos V4 (there shouldn't be many). -- Marxpitn