From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 25 10:17:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0007C16A4E1; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:17:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.10.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE79F43D58; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:17:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from xdivac02@eva.fit.vutbr.cz) (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k6PAHUeS013584 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:17:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.13.7/8.13.3/Submit) id k6PAHUU7013583; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:17:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:17:29 +0200 From: Divacky Roman To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20060725101729.GA13468@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <44C39D7E.30102@mail.web.am> <20060724080620.GA39934@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <200607241720.36606.jhb@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200607241720.36606.jhb@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 147.229.10.14 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Gaspar Chilingarov Subject: Re: Are there any beakage of linuxulator (on amd64)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:17:43 -0000 On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 05:20:35PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 24 July 2006 04:06, Divacky Roman wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 09:02:06PM +0500, Gaspar Chilingarov wrote: > > > Hi all! > > > > > > After upgrading from -CURRENT mid-Mart to Jul 22 current I got a > > > failures for Linux applications which try to use X. > > > > > > About my system: amd64, I'm trying to run openoffice and skype, but they > > > fail with "Segmentation fault". ktrace also produces dump, which makes > > > kdump fail also with segfault. > > > > > > Is this known issue or I've messed somethng on my system while upgrading? > > > > yes... linuxolator@amd64 is currently broken. afaik the commit to linux_ipc > > removing stackgap usage broke it. I hope someone (jhb?) is working on it > > I'm waiting for someone to help figure out which specific linux_semctl() > request is broken. All the attempts to use ktrace so far have failed. :( If > someone would like to engage in some printf or KTR spelunking that would be > helpful. I had much better luck with truss then with kdump when playing with linux apps. this thursday at work I'll try to provide some more info, what exaclty do you need? is what -DDEBUG prints enough? roman