From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Dec 12 02:54:41 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id CAA10483 for stable-outgoing; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 02:54:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable) Received: from solaric.UkrCard.Kiev.UA (ukrcard-gu.gu.net [194.93.170.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA10469 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 02:54:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from alex@solaric.UkrCard.Kiev.UA) Received: from localhost (alex@localhost) by solaric.UkrCard.Kiev.UA (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id KAA00406; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 10:58:38 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from alex@solaric.UkrCard.Kiev.UA) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 10:58:38 +0200 (EET) From: Alexander Tatmaniants To: Dan Jacobowitz cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: disappearing ports In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, Dan Jacobowitz wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, Alexander Tatmaniants wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, Dan Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > > I just cvsupped for the first time in a wee...(ports-all, src-all, and the > > > eBones stuff) - and cvsup is now busy wiping /usr/ports completely. How > > > the heck did that come about? Is /usr/ports no longer suppable or > > > something? > > there is no ports for -stable, try to check out ports for -release > > (tag: RELEASE_2_2_5) or for -current (no tags needed). > > > > Um.... > no, you fail to understand. I know the ports ARE included in RELENG_2_2. I don't think so root@solaric:~ftp/pub# cd /usr/ports/ root@solaric:/usr/ports# cvs status -v Makefile =================================================================== File: Makefile Status: Up-to-date Working revision: 1.36 Sat Oct 4 15:54:31 1997 Repository revision: 1.36 /src/ncvs/ports/Makefile,v Sticky Tag: RELEASE_2_2_5 (revision: 1.36) Sticky Date: (none) Sticky Options: (none) Existing Tags: RELEASE_2_2_5 (revision: 1.36) RELEASE_2_2_1 (revision: 1.30) RELEASE_2_2_2 (revision: 1.33) ports_2_0 (revision: 1.1.1.1) ports (branch: 1.1.1) root@solaric:/usr/ports# how about this? > First of all, anything in RELEASE_2_2_5 is in there - that's a state of > the branch as someone just explained. Plus, I've done 'rm -rf /usr/ports; > cvsup mars-sup' to fix the collection once when it got corrupted. But > today, they aren't there any more. > >