Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 11:59:33 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jason C. Wells" <jcwells@highperformance.net> To: Axel Scheepers <axel@axel.truedestiny.net> Cc: FreeBSD-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Double // Cause Problem ? Message-ID: <20020505114752.H2302-100000@server2.highperformance.net> In-Reply-To: <20020505141815.C21194@mars.thuis>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Axel Scheepers wrote: > On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 01:18:36PM -0700, Jason C. Wells wrote: > > Will the '//' in the library paths here cause trouble? > > It will work fine and shouldn't cause any problems. OK. > > I do not suppose that they will. I am having a crappy time getting imap > > kerberized so I am suspicious of everything. > > Can you be more specific about this? Most of the times it's just an option > to turn on. You could also check if your imap implementation is compiled > with Kerberos support using the ldd command on the imap program. Indeed. I have used ldd and the imapd is linked to the kerberos libraries. When I use Pine to connect to my imap server using the /secure switch, kerberos authentication is simply not available. Everything seems to be linked, but it still doesn't work. I have been tinkering with many options in the imap-uw build and also the c-client build. I can get imap to work with no kerberos. Kerberos works fine for host authentication. It's just this darned imap that is causing me grief. If you have kerberos and imap playing nice together, I sure would like to hear that someone running FreeBSD has this right. Thanks, Jason C. Wells To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020505114752.H2302-100000>