Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 13:53:50 -0600 From: Peter Warrick <peter@guest-teik.com> To: Fernando Gleiser <fgleiser@cactus.fi.uba.ar> Cc: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Redhat Linux Route command translated to FreeBSD? Message-ID: <200107251950.NAA12554@mail.guest-tek.com> In-Reply-To: <20010724201354.T75434-100000@cactus.fi.uba.ar>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail-1136603887-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset=us-ascii
This I have tried. The problem is that it then specifies the gateway of
1.2.3.4 as the MAC address of xl0. I am not sure if this is correct but
it still doesn't work for my purposes.. Here's an example of what the
ifconfig and route table looks like in redhat.
ifconfig
eth1:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:EC:F1:EB
inet addr:1.2.3.1 Bcast:1.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.255
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
route
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
1.2.3.4 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
eth1
Now in FreeBSD...
ifconfig -au
en1: flags=8963<UP,BROADCAST,b6,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu
1500
inet 1.2.3.1 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 1.2.3.1
ether 00:00:c5:53:07:ac
media: autoselect (100baseTX) status: active
supported media: 10baseT/UTP 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex>
100baseTX <full-duplex> autoselect autoselect 10baseT/UTP
netstat -nr
Routing tables
Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif
Expire
1.2.3.1/32 link#4 UC 0 0 en1
1.2.3.4 0:0:c5:53:7:ac UHLS 0 0 en1
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 22 9587562 lo0
I have gotten rid of all the other extraneous IPs of my network but that
is all the necessary info I can provide...
In the Linux Redhat network 1.2.3.4 and 1.2.3.1 can now communicate with
each other. In the FreeBSD network they don't seem to want to talk..
Even though I see the traffic on the network of a ping there is no
response. I see arp requests and also replys so from a MAC address level
they know where each other are.
The other thing that is interesting is that when I bring on an entire
subnet and once the arp calls start happening I see the IP's of machines
on that network with their respective MAC addresses in the routing table
of the server. But when I add the host to the routing table it puts in
the MAC address of the NIC in the server for the Gateway. I'm curious if
this is the problem? I am thinking I need to say that 1.2.3.4 is at a
specific MAC address or something in the routing table?
I hope this makes some sense..
Thanks again for any help.
Pete
On Tuesday, July 24, 2001, at 05:15 PM, Fernando Gleiser wrote:
> Let's say the interface's name is xl0 in FreeBSD, then you say
>
> route add -host 1.2.3.4 -interface xl0
>
> Or, man route for more details. =0)
>
>
> Fer
>
>
>
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Peter Warrick wrote:
>
>> Anyone have any idea what the direct translation of this redhat command
>> would be to BSD??
>>
>> route add -host 1.2.3.4 dev eth1:0
>>
>> eth1:0 is an alias on the eth1 network. eth1:0's IP is 1.2.3.1. What
>> that command does is say that 1.2.3.4 is directly connected to the
>> eth1:0 network. This means that it is routing this 1.2.3.4 IP to
>> 1.2.3.1. Even though these addresses seem to be on the same subnet.
>> They
>> actually aren't in my configuration.
>>
>> Thanks for any help.. I've been stuck on getting this to work on my BSD
>> box for about a month now. :(
>>
>> Pete
>>
>> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>>
>
--Apple-Mail-1136603887-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/enriched;
charset=us-ascii
This I have tried. The problem is that it then specifies the gateway
of 1.2.3.4 as the MAC address of xl0. I am not sure if this is correct
but it still doesn't work for my purposes.. Here's an example of what
the ifconfig and route table looks like in redhat.
ifconfig
<fontfamily><param>VT100</param>eth1:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
52:54:00:EC:F1:EB =20
inet addr:1.2.3.1 Bcast:1.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.255
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 =
Metric:1</fontfamily>
route
<fontfamily><param>VT100</param>Destination Gateway =20
Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
1.2.3.4 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 =20
0 eth1</fontfamily>
Now in FreeBSD...
ifconfig -au
en1: flags=3D8963<<UP,BROADCAST,b6,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST>
mtu 1500
inet 1.2.3.1 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 1.2.3.1
ether 00:00:c5:53:07:ac=20
media: autoselect (100baseTX) status: active
supported media: 10baseT/UTP 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP
<<full-duplex> 100baseTX <<full-duplex> autoselect autoselect
10baseT/UTP
netstat -nr
<fontfamily><param>VT100</param>Routing tables
Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif
Expire
1.2.3.1/32 link#4 UC 0 0 en1
1.2.3.4 0:0:c5:53:7:ac UHLS 0 0 en1
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 22 9587562 lo0
</fontfamily>
I have gotten rid of all the other extraneous IPs of my network but
that is all the necessary info I can provide...
In the Linux Redhat network 1.2.3.4 and 1.2.3.1 can now communicate
with each other. In the FreeBSD network they don't seem to want to
talk.. Even though I see the traffic on the network of a ping there is
no response. I see arp requests and also replys so from a MAC address
level they know where each other are.=20
The other thing that is interesting is that when I bring on an entire
subnet and once the arp calls start happening I see the IP's of
machines on that network with their respective MAC addresses in the
routing table of the server. But when I add the host to the routing
table it puts in the MAC address of the NIC in the server for the
Gateway. I'm curious if this is the problem? I am thinking I need to
say that 1.2.3.4 is at a specific MAC address or something in the
routing table?
I hope this makes some sense..=20
Thanks again for any help.
Pete
On Tuesday, July 24, 2001, at 05:15 PM, Fernando Gleiser wrote:
<excerpt>Let's say the interface's name is xl0 in FreeBSD, then you say
route add -host 1.2.3.4 -interface xl0
Or, man route for more details. =3D0)
Fer
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Peter Warrick wrote:
<excerpt>Anyone have any idea what the direct translation of this
redhat command
would be to BSD??
route add -host 1.2.3.4 dev eth1:0
eth1:0 is an alias on the eth1 network. eth1:0's IP is 1.2.3.1. What
that command does is say that 1.2.3.4 is directly connected to the
eth1:0 network. This means that it is routing this 1.2.3.4 IP to
1.2.3.1. Even though these addresses seem to be on the same subnet.
They
actually aren't in my configuration.
Thanks for any help.. I've been stuck on getting this to work on my BSD
box for about a month now. :(
Pete
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
</excerpt>
</excerpt>=
--Apple-Mail-1136603887-1--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200107251950.NAA12554>