From owner-freebsd-audit Fri Nov 16 9:17: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961BA37B418; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:16:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.seasidesoftware.co.za) by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 164mcx-000IjC-00; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 19:18:07 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: ru@FreeBSD.org, audit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/natd natd.8 natd.c In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 16 Nov 2001 18:10:26 +0100." <17182.1005930626@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 19:18:07 +0200 Message-ID: <71993.1005931087@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 16 Nov 2001 18:10:26 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > The compromise Ruslan and I ended up with when we discussed this in Brighton > was that the print would be disabled unless enabled specifically and that > the verbose option should also enable it, and that yes, adding useful > info to it makes sense. I guess one argument in favour of this is the default brevity of the IPFW code itself, where the "log" keyword does nothing until special action is taken. Okay, so Ruslan, are you happy with using getnameinfo() to add additional detail? The only drawback I can think of is that it will defeat syslog(3) message coalescing (message repeated X times). However, given the default behaviour that Poul-Henning describes, I don't think it makes too much sense to worry about that. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message