From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Sep  6 12:55:00 1995
Return-Path: security-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id MAA06332
          for security-outgoing; Wed, 6 Sep 1995 12:55:00 -0700
Received: from haven.uniserve.com (haven.uniserve.com [198.53.215.121])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA06300
          for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Wed, 6 Sep 1995 12:54:57 -0700
Received: by haven.uniserve.com id <30736>; Wed, 6 Sep 1995 12:56:33 +0100
Date: 	Wed, 6 Sep 1995 12:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com>
To: Bill Trost <trost@cloud.rain.com>
cc: Brian Tao <taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Do we *really* need logger(1)? 
In-Reply-To: <m0sqPDt-00004yC@cloud.rain.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950906125555.7950A-100000@haven.uniserve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: security-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 6 Sep 1995, Bill Trost wrote:

> Internet, so syslogd(8) can also be used as a remote disk-filling
> service.  (And, since it's UDP-based, you can't tcp-wrap it...).

  tcp_wrapper is primitive.  xinetd is better and can support UDP.

Tom