From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Sat Oct 10 13:42:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D263A105C0; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:42:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 178971AB6; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:42:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkuPM-000FCf-Aj; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:41:56 +0300 Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:41:56 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Dmitry Morozovsky Cc: =?koi8-r?Q?Jean-S'ebastien_P'edron?= , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r289109 - head/sys/dev/drm2/i915 Message-ID: <20151010134156.GK6469@zxy.spb.ru> References: <201510100743.t9A7h2OI000544@repo.freebsd.org> <20151010093503.GA42243@zxy.spb.ru> <5618E51A.7030300@FreeBSD.org> <20151010102233.GJ6469@zxy.spb.ru> <561900B6.5000306@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:42:00 -0000 On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 04:37:43PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Sat, 10 Oct 2015, Jean-S?bastien P?dron wrote: > > > That said, I'm not sure a kernel from HEAD will work nicely with > > userland from 10.2. That's worth a try. > > well, it should -- otherwise stable/10 jails would not work under -current. smartctl from 8.x don't work under 10.2. > Not the other way os course. More interesting about X11.