From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 20 14:51:42 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED3516A420
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:51:42 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sico@loquefaltaba.com)
Received: from mail.loquefaltaba.com (78.Red-213-96-97.staticIP.rima-tde.net
	[213.96.97.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF75243D55
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:51:40 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sico@loquefaltaba.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost.loquefaltaba.com [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.loquefaltaba.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8FCC14F;
	Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:51:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.loquefaltaba.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (sico.loquefaltaba.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 33905-10; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:51:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from webmail.loquefaltaba.com (localhost.loquefaltaba.com
	[127.0.0.1])
	by mail.loquefaltaba.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA9CC11B;
	Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:51:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 194.179.68.110 (SquirrelMail authenticated user sico)
	by webmail.loquefaltaba.com with HTTP;
	Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:51:30 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <55243.194.179.68.110.1140447090.squirrel@webmail.loquefaltaba.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060221001623.C1003@laptop.lan>
References: <43767.150.101.159.26.1140420612.squirrel@mailbox.TU-Berlin.DE>
	<20060220124350.GK96737@FreeBSD.org>
	<20060221001623.C1003@laptop.lan>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:51:30 +0100 (CET)
From: "David Barbero" <sico@loquefaltaba.com>
To: "Peter Ross" <Peter.Ross@alumni.tu-berlin.de>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at loquefaltaba.com
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bge(4) problem
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:51:42 -0000


Peter Ross wrote:
> Yes, they are copper. I did not try to connect them against each other but
> I tried to connect them to the data centre uplink (100 MBit, I do not know
> what it is..anyway, the onboard cards are working with it.) It worked with
> 100MBit but I saw the same packet loss there.

Are you try to force media to 100baseTX fullDuplex???

In many times i have similar problem whit a switch Lan don't negociate
correct media...

-- 
"Linux is for people who hate Windows, BSD is for
people who love UNIX"
"Social Engineer -> Because there is no patch for human stupidity"