Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 08:25:50 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: archivers/rpm build problem Message-ID: <20140702062550.GI7307@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20140701123008.GA77747@in-addr.com> References: <20140701123008.GA77747@in-addr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 08:30:08AM -0400, Gary Palmer wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I've had a problem with archivers/rpm since the last update. It refuses > to build saying >=20 > =3D=3D=3D> Building for rpm-3.0.6_17 > cd . && aclocal > aclocal: macro `_LT_DECL_SED' required but not defined > aclocal: macro `_LT_FUNC_STRIPNAME_CNF' required but not defined > aclocal: macro `gl_ICONV_H_DEFAULTS' required but not defined > gmake: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 1 > =3D=3D=3D> Compilation failed unexpectedly. >=20 > I've included a build log below. Any ideas? >=20 > Please keep me on CC as I do not believe I am subscribed to freebsd-ports >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Gary >=20 I can confirm the problem and will see if I can fix, I was wondering why do= you or other people use rpm for? I am planning to remove archivers/rpm and recommanding using archivers/rpm4 instead, so I need to need any corner case where rpm4 cannot do rpm3 job. btw the linux ports now directly use plain bsdtar :) regards, Bapt --IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlOzpe4ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EypnwCgh3yRUgUzHxbsJ+wFqNL8ABHS O7IAoIQgpkVkC2XxORozL0B7M8C1bGp8 =BByR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140702062550.GI7307>