From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jan 28 3:12:10 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380F037B405 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 03:12:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.com (mailout03.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC4843FC3 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 03:12:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from corecode@corecode.ath.cx) Received: from fwd07.sul.t-online.de by mailout03.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 18dTet-0001AD-09; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:12:03 +0100 Received: from pride.uni.stoert.net (320050403952-0001@[217.82.50.249]) by fmrl07.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 18dTeb-0ne9T6C; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:11:45 +0100 Received: from terrorfish.uni.stoert.net (terrorfish.uni.stoert.net [10.150.180.178]) by pride.uni.stoert.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C62812D824; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:11:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from terrorfish.uni.stoert.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by terrorfish.uni.stoert.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h0SBCUZb001213; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:12:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from corecode@terrorfish.uni.stoert.net) Received: (from corecode@localhost) by terrorfish.uni.stoert.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h0SBCTWP001212; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:12:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from corecode) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:12:25 +0100 From: "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" To: Jason Harris Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/47563: [maintainer-update] ports/www/elinks 0.3.2 -> 0.4.2 Message-Id: <20030128121225.050b2325.corecode@corecode.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <200301271923.h0RJNBQ01808@pm1.ric-17.lft.widomaker.com> References: <200301271923.h0RJNBQ01808@pm1.ric-17.lft.widomaker.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.aL:yLDi)eym)Gu" X-Sender: 320050403952-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --=.aL:yLDi)eym)Gu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lately Jason Harris told: > --- distinfo 2003/01/07 18:07:53 1.15 > +++ distinfo 2003/01/27 19:15:48 > @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ > -MD5 (elinks-0.3.2.tar.bz2) = 30e9012d5c9b0c0948f6212537da288c > -MD5 (elinks-0.3.2.tar.bz2.asc) = eaeb77ed86bbfa353b6c067c1ad6b39b > +MD5 (elinks-0.4.2.tar.bz2) = bb77dcd59968634477f5a6d5f07ccd5e > +MD5 (elinks-0.4.2.tar.bz2.asc) = ae0fb86afdb253bc32cac94bfed0b8c0 i understand this is not specific to this update (thus sent to ports@) but still i'd like to discuss about it: o is there a point in fetching the signature when it's not being checked by the ports' infrastructure (and thus ignored while building / installing)? do we optionally want to introduce such a feature? but how do we check for the validity of the signature? add the key fingerprint to the port and let gnupg fetch the key automatically? include the key itself? i think it might be an interresting thing to do, but is this needed in aspect of us already recording md5s? cheers simon -- /"\ http://corecode.ath.cx/#donate \ / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign / \ Against HTML Mail and News --=.aL:yLDi)eym)Gu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+NmWdr5S+dk6z85oRAvNKAJ9PRESTnA4Ofbxa6U5q3YiqFOhFfwCgrpad zFSxzLLjUHbtXapaEqRn5P8= =Xu38 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.aL:yLDi)eym)Gu-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message