From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 18 05:49:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0DD16A4CE for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 05:49:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from auk2.snu.ac.kr (auk2.snu.ac.kr [147.46.100.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58CAE43D48 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 05:49:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stopspam@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from [147.46.44.181] (stopspam@users.sourceforge.net) by auk2.snu.ac.kr (Terrace Internet Messaging Server) with ESMTP id 2004061814:48:44:342127.23117.2615782320 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:48:44 +0900 (KST) Message-ID: <40D28248.3060704@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:48:56 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040507 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TERRACE-SPAMMARK: NO (SR:6.89) (by Terrace) Subject: 5-Current: problems with many ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 05:49:41 -0000 Hi, After I purchased a brandnew harddisk, I decided to also try out 5-current as the new OS on this disk. Installing system went all fine and smooth (5.2.1 install, then cvsupped to current), and compiled/installed new world and kernel. However, since I am now installing many apps from the ports, I encounter problem after problem, ports installs ending with errors; such as configure runs that fail (e.g. libexif), ld complaining about libXpm.so.4 related things (teTeX/LyX). So far I failed to install gimp and teTeX, which would make that PC rather useless to me. Time to step back to 4.X? Are the ports not ready with 5-Current kernel? Or am I doing something wrong? Thanks, Rob.