Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 10:31:04 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Koichiro IWAO <meta@vmeta.jp> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: archivers/rpm build problem Message-ID: <20140702083103.GJ7307@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <00000146f62c7bb6-13a698a3-9a41-4a29-98af-fe57c95b3325-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> References: <20140701123008.GA77747@in-addr.com> <20140702062550.GI7307@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <00000146f62c7bb6-13a698a3-9a41-4a29-98af-fe57c95b3325-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Do4IU1xF/9sod/r6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 08:24:08AM +0000, Koichiro IWAO wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 08:25:50AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > I can confirm the problem and will see if I can fix, I was wondering wh= y do you > > or other people use rpm for? I am planning to remove archivers/rpm and > > recommanding using archivers/rpm4 instead, so I need to need any corner= case > > where rpm4 cannot do rpm3 job. > >=20 > > btw the linux ports now directly use plain bsdtar :) >=20 > Can't argue with migrating rpm from 3 to 4. > At least I still use rpm. Not for extracting rpms but evaluating > rpm macros like 'rpm --eval %_bindir'. >=20 Then you might be happy to have rpm4 because rpm4 is what is mostly used to package/create rpms out there :) regards, Bapt --Do4IU1xF/9sod/r6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlOzw0cACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzTSQCgvexpGXS7YVpKdV6Q5T9gluAS a6wAn33TvDFbEryH862Khtmamps1kAva =Lmuq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Do4IU1xF/9sod/r6--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140702083103.GJ7307>