Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 21:16:45 -0600 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Stephen McKay <mckay@thehub.com.au>, chat@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Course of law (was: Islam (was: Religions (was Re: helping victims of terror))) Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20011023211321.04da92f0@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20011024120609.F28396@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20011023203144.04dbca80@localhost> <1003617187.3bd1fba3d31ff@webmail.neomedia.it> <1003617187.3bd1fba3d31ff@webmail.neomedia.it> <4.3.2.7.2.20011020213927.048a1780@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20011021172133.04293620@localhost> <200110231322.f9NDMTf21954@dungeon.home> <4.3.2.7.2.20011023103803.04978a90@localhost> <20011024093452.B28396@wantadilla.lemis.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20011023200438.04daac60@localhost> <20011024114401.D28396@wantadilla.lemis.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20011023203144.04dbca80@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 08:36 PM 10/23/2001, Greg Lehey wrote: >You're dodging the subject. Not at all. >Anyway, you're also wrong. Your ignorance of the facts does not mean that I am incorrect. > In the >democracies of which *I'm* aware, there is a due course of justice. >It doesn't involve invading places and shooting first. Any such >invasion is outside the law. If you can make me aware of any >democracy whose laws allow this, then you will be right. There are many. However, the most relevant example happens to be the United States. (Australia probably allows such things as "no-knock searches" and SWAT teams, too, since -- at least up until September 11th -- it rated slightly lower on the civil liberties scale than the US.) >> Do you know what a SWAT team is? > >No. Then look it up on the Web.... --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20011023211321.04da92f0>