From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 8 02:47:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7248F37B401 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 02:47:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from perimeter.co.za (obelix.perimeter.co.za [209.212.102.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D74343F85 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 02:47:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd@perimeter.co.za) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 9999) by perimeter.co.za with local; Fri, 08 Aug 2003 11:47:37 +0200 References: <20030808091546.GA98440@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030808094220.GA98568@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030808094220.GA98568@rot13.obsecurity.org> From: bsd@perimeter.co.za To: Kris Kennaway Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 11:47:36 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: cc: FreeBSD Question List Subject: Re: /usr/ports/lang/ruby X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 09:47:43 -0000 Kris Kennaway writes: >> And I'm curious about dependencies. For example, portupgrade's own version >> has not changed, and 'pkg_info -r portupgrade*' still shows >> ruby-1.6.8.2003.04.19 as required. > > Yes, as it should. The port has not been upgraded, it has only moved > location. The next time it is upgraded, portupgrade will follow the > entry in the MOVED file to the new location, and everything will > continue to be just fine :) > > Kris Aaahh! - she be very pretty! OK - so I should learn a little patience (like my mother always told me - something about a virtue.....) and in due course the tango will be completed. Thanks for taking the time out for me Kris. Regards, Patrick.