Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:04:19 -0700 From: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Cc: Mykola Dzham <i@levsha.me>, current@freebsd.org, Stanislav Sedov <stas@freebsd.org>, pp@gmail.com, "portmgr@freebsd.org" <portmgr@freebsd.org>, jilles@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports on 10.0-CURRENT: r226027 is incorrect fix Message-ID: <20111010120419.9cfee3e9.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CADLo83-3m0L=tvRiasQbroS%2BUwyJF5cU7mBaSpw9pjSnAEn0RQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20111007230336.GB3051@laptop.levsha.me> <20111007164411.554ac9c0.stas@FreeBSD.org> <CADLo83-3m0L=tvRiasQbroS%2BUwyJF5cU7mBaSpw9pjSnAEn0RQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:35:13 +0100 Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> mentioned: > > Last I heard, portmgr explicitly disapproved of this fix-- have I missed > something??? Erwin specifically said not to do it. > > Since when can anyone just commit stuff to bsd.port.mk, regardless of its > location? > > This is a bad solution, please revert it or I will when I get back. We're > going to end up being asked to support it on ports@ otherwise. > You certianly missed something, including the rationale behind the portmgr@ descision of not committing to the ports tree (!) bsd.port.mk. Go find some useful work to do like deleting old ports or whatever. You might want to consider deleting all mine ports, as I'm not going to support them anymore (after you backed out this fix without approval I don't have a working ports tree anymore on any of my 3 workstations). -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111010120419.9cfee3e9.stas>