From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 16 07:58:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DE916A417; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:58:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex.kovalenko@verizon.net) Received: from vms040pub.verizon.net (vms040pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E67913C43E; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:58:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex.kovalenko@verizon.net) Received: from [10.0.3.231] ([70.111.176.151]) by vms040.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JWB005FRNLOBNE2@vms040.mailsrvcs.net>; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 02:01:01 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 02:58:22 -0500 From: "Alexandre \"Sunny\" Kovalenko" In-reply-to: To: Hajimu UMEMOTO Message-id: <1203148702.821.21.camel@RabbitsDen> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT References: <20080208045605.15C874500E@ptavv.es.net> <47ABF402.7030904@root.org> <1202475519.7014.7.camel@RabbitsDen> <1203126071.833.19.camel@RabbitsDen> <1203136636.821.4.camel@RabbitsDen> Cc: acpi@freebsd.org, Johannes Dieterich , Ian Smith Subject: Re: [RFC] Patch to enable temperature ceiling in powerd X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:58:40 -0000 On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 16:17 +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > > >>>>> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:37:16 -0500 > >>>>> "Alexandre \"Sunny\" Kovalenko" said: > > Thank you for confirmation. I've just committed it. Thank you very much. Any chance of MFC? > > alex> I have one question regarding this patch: it enables passive cooling for > alex> the thermal zone, which has _PSV, _TSP, _TC1 and _TC2. Isn't it > alex> necessary to also have _PSL in the thermal zone to have passive cooling? > > Since cpufreq enumerates all CPUs for us, we ignore _PSL for now. > However, it's possible in the future _PSL will reference non-CPU > devices so we may want to support it then. So, on the multi-socket motherboards, with the separate TZ objects for each socket, we will throttle all available CPUs, right? > > Sincerely, > > -- > Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan > ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org > http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko (Олександр Коваленко)