From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Nov 14 22:13:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from sabmail.rresearch.com (ip18.gte13.rb1.bel.nwlink.com [207.202.150.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E582214CAD for ; Sun, 14 Nov 1999 22:13:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scott@sabmail.rresearch.com) Received: from sabmail.rresearch.com (localhost.seanet.com [127.0.0.1]) by sabmail.rresearch.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA16630 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 1999 22:13:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scott@sabmail.rresearch.com) Message-Id: <199911150613.WAA16630@sabmail.rresearch.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Scott Blachowicz Reply-To: Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org Subject: question updating mail/nmh port MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <16627.942646415.1@sabmail.rresearch.com> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 22:13:35 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi- I'm in the process of updating the nmh port from version 1.0 to the recently released 1.0.2 and I noticed something odd in my old patches. I patch the acconfig.h file in the distribution to (apparently) try to get it configured to do FLOCK_LOCKING instead of DOT_LOCKING. However, I just noticed (after doing a 'make configure') that the config.h file I end up with is setup for DOT_LOCKING. Then, just to try to see what "the system" uses, I checked the sendmail sources from my FreeBSD-3.2 system - other OS's seem to define a HASFLOCK cpp var, but not for the BSDs. So, I figured I'd check to verify what the proper setting should be. Suggestions? Thanx, -- Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message