Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:26:55 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> To: cpghost <cpghost@cordula.ws> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sched_ule(1) and sched_4bsd(1) Message-ID: <20080630022655.D7B0945047@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:24:02 %2B0200." <20080630012402.GA30723@epia-2.farid-hajji.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_1214792815_2197P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:24:02 +0200 > From: cpghost <cpghost@cordula.ws> > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > Hello, > > the man-pages sched_4bsd(1) and sched_ule(1) as of > FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Sat Jun 28 22:44:54 CEST 2008 > both state that SCHED_4BSD is the default scheduler. > Yet SCHED_ULE is now in GENERIC, and not SCHED_4BSD! > > Are the man-pages wrong, or is it better to change > SCHED_ULE back to SCHED_4BSD in a custom kernel > config file? I'm using SCHED_ULE on UP systems for > quite some time now, and there don't seem to be any > regressions so far... Looks like the man pages are a bit outdated. 4BSD was in GENERIC in 7.0-RELEASE, but it was changed to ULE in stable shortly after the release of 7.0. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 --==_Exmh_1214792815_2197P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 06/03/2002 iD8DBQFIaERvkn3rs5h7N1ERAvN4AJwLX+Jv5eiE3DYt/o4UxmwDToE2cgCffMye a6A2zHA59ykTWcq7LyDgSzc= =Qx1H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1214792815_2197P--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080630022655.D7B0945047>